The Bharat Mandapam in New Delhi, usually a site for diplomatic handshakes, became the epicenter of a fundamental shift in the global technology order this week. As the India AI Impact Summit 2026 drew to a close, the signing of the “Pax Silica” declaration signaled more than just a trade agreement; it marked the dawn of “AI Sovereignty” as a core pillar of the industrial world.
The summit moved past the parlor tricks of generative chatbots, focusing instead on the “Agentic Revolution”—the deployment of autonomous AI systems capable of executing complex workflows without human prompts. However, as the hype hit the reality of production, the industry reached a collective realization: an agent without an evaluator is a liability.
Pax Silica: The New Silicon Order
The summit was defined by the unveiling of the American AI Exports Program and the National Champions Initiative. These programs are designed to export the “American AI Stack” to trusted global partners, creating a secure, democratic corridor for silicon and intelligence.
“Pax Silica is the coalition that will define the 21st-century economic and technological order,” stated US Ambassador Sergio Gor. “It is designed to secure the entire silicon stack, from the mines… to the data centers where we deploy frontier AI.”
But as US tech giants—including Google CEO Sundar Pichai and Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella—headlined the event, a deeper tension surfaced. While the technology is ready for export, the industry is not yet ready to govern it. Nadella pointed to a growing “model overhang,” where the raw power of AI models is outpacing the infrastructure needed to make them safe and functional in the real world.
The Climax: The Death of “Fast, Cheap, and Better”
For decades, the project management triangle dictated that you could only pick two: Fast, Cheap, or Better. The initial promise of Agentic AI was that it would finally break this logic by being all three.
However, the logic brought forth by platforms like Eval QA has exposed this as a dangerous fallacy in the context of autonomous agents. The industry is currently trapped in a “Quality Conundrum”:
- The Mirage of “Fast”: While an AI agent can perform a task in seconds, the time required to verify its output, fix its “confidently wrong” hallucinations, and recover from its logic errors often makes the total cycle time slower than human labor.
- The Hidden Cost of “Cheap”: Inference costs are dropping, but the sheer volume of “agentic loops” (where AI agents talk to other agents) is causing compute budgets to skyrocket. If it isn’t “Better,” the cost of failure makes it the most expensive option on the menu.
- The “Better” Paradox: In a high-stakes environment, “Better” is the only variable that matters. If the AI is not 100% reliable, it is neither fast nor cheap—it is simply a source of chaos.
Practically speaking, as Eval QA explains, because most current agentic workflows fail the “Better” test, they inevitably fail to be “Fast” (due to rework) or “Cheap” (due to the cost of error).
The Solution: The Human-in-the-Loop Architect
If the conundrum of 2025 was “How do we build it?”, the mandate for 2026 is “How do we prove it works?” This is where platforms like Eval QA are shifting the industry focus toward the Evaluation Engineer.
Evaluation Engineers are the specialized class of talent tasked with building the “deterministic guardrails” around probabilistic AI. They don’t just prompt the AI; they architect the testing frameworks that catch “agentic drift” before it reaches the customer.
“To build AI that is truly helpful, we must… approach it responsibly,” Sundar Pichai noted during his address. That responsibility now rests on the shoulders of these evaluators. They are the ones who turn the “Fast-Cheap-Better” conundrum into a manageable reality by prioritizing Validation over Automation.
A Conclusive Shift
The India AI Impact Summit proved that AI Sovereignty isn’t just about who owns the data or the chips—it’s about who controls the Quality Control.
As Prime Minister Narendra Modi aptly summarized, the goal of the M.A.N.A.V. Vision is to ensure AI is “Moral, Accountable, and Valid.” For the global industry, this means the era of “move fast and break things” is over. In the Pax Silica era, the most powerful companies won’t be the ones with the smartest agents, but those with the smartest evaluators.
The chaos of the “Model Overhang” is real, but through rigorous evaluation engineering, the industry can finally bridge the gap between AI’s potential and its performance.
Related Reads:
The Rise of the “AI Strategist”: Why Companies are Moving Beyond Tech Roles This story provides a deep dive into how only 34% have successfully redesigned their core business models to realize a material, enterprise-level ROI. The majority are stuck in “AI Theater”—running impressive pilots that fail to move the needle on the P&L statement.
